Newsgroups: alt.ufo.reports
From: kymhorsell@gmail.com
Subject: ufo researcher denied access to ufo data nr canada nukes

[uploaded 14 times; last 07/09/2024]

I noticed a ufo researcher in Canada is suing over his denial of
access to records of UFO sightings nr nuclear facilities.


  <https://thedebrief.org/canadian-journalist-hires-law-firm-after-being-denied-access-to-files-on-uap-sightings-at-nuclear-power-facilities/>
  Canadian Journalist Hires Law Firm After Being Denied Access to Files on UAP
  Sightings at Nuclear Power Facilities
  Chrissy Newton
  November 28, 2023
  Senior military and intelligence personnel have consistently reported
  the presence of Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP) in proximity to
  locations linked to nuclear power, weaponry, and technology across the
  United States for the past 75 years.
  However, the U.S. is not the only country in which unknown aerial
  objects have been observed, and sometimes close to sites of national
  security significance.
  "Canadians report seeing UFOs in the sky at a rate of 3 times a day,"
  says Chris Rutkowski, a Canadian ufologist and media expert. "There are
  about 1,000 UFO reports filed in Canada every year, and the number
  remains high."


Access to the material is one thing.  But I'll take this opportunity
to emphasise again that UFO sightings don't appear to cluster around
nuclear facilities.  It seems some military-based data is "obviously"
biased because such sightings come from military bases that may be
located nr high-security areas like nuke silos or nuclear plants.
Analysis of biased data is a big chunk of what data science is about
and any researcher is well advised to get a book and study it up.
Otherwise they could spend a lot of money and 80 years chasing
theories that just don't stack up.

We've looked at this before in the US. We plotted the number of
nuclear plants (and also total number of reactors) against UFO
sightings further and further out from those states. We found a
totally interesting pattern -- the number of sightings INCREASED away
from states with high numbers of nuclear plants in 3 very distinctive
patterns.  The patterns were exactly in line with what we also found
regarding different kinds of military bases.  Sightings further and
further away from high security facilities like these tend to follow 3
a priori understandable curves.  (a) where UFO sightings increase
linearly with distance from the plant; (b) the square of the distance;
(c) the sqrt root of the distance.

We supposed that these distance relationships are due to a property of
the UFOs. They feel "threatened" by something associated with
different plants and a wary of getting too close. By and large. It is
probably worrying that SOME UFO's don't seem to take the general advice
of the bulk of their peers and *do* sometimes fly very close to
high-security areas. If they are no worried about any threat, it's
probably wise to assume they have a good reason to be so confident.

The reason for the curves is related to the threat. If an aircraft is
aware of area patrols around a location then they might assume a
threat related to the amount of time it would take an area patrol to
find them. An area patrol in a region of radius R might take a time
proportional to the area of the relevant circle -- i.e. a time ~R^2.
I.e. said aircraft might perceive a "threat" that has a curve approx
1/R^2.  The further they fly from that secure point the threat drops
off as 1/R^2 and we might expect the number of sightings of aircraft
at that distance would tend to rise inversely to the threat --
i.e. around R^2.

So a curve of R^2 might indicate aircraft are wary of area patrols.
Similarly, a curve ~R might be reacting to the threat of an intercept
aircraft. Unlike a wandering patrol, a facility with a radar lock on
an aircraft can scramble an interceptor that will arrive on scene
probably on full AB in time 1/R. I.e. a curve of sightings rising as R
means aircraft may be wary of interceptors.  Finally, a curve of
sightings rising as sqrt(R) away from a point may indicate a
perceived threat from a missile. Ground to air missiles tend to
accelerate continuously over quite long distances.  They don't slow
down to a limit speed like aircraft. They just keep pushing. The time
of flight of a missile can therefore be sqrt(R).  And aircraft
sightings that increase as sqrt(R) probably indicate said aircraft
perceive a threat from G2A missiles at the relevant secure location.

If we therefore take the locations of some key Canadian nuclear plants
(no doubt I am now in a terror watch list because I just googled the
lat and long of several such plants) and plot the number of sightings
of Canadian UFO's by distance from each one, we find the expected
curves. Out to a distance of 3000 km we find 2 bumps in each one.
Sightings do NOT increase close in to the plants. They are almost 0.
Sightings seem to increase out to ~500 km, decrease again, and
increase again out to 3000 km.

Zooming in on the close-in curves we find some a priori patterns.
Some plants exhibit a likely threat perception related to distance from
the plant -- i.e. R. It seems within 500 or 350 km of the 3 nuclear
plants in question UFO's are wary of area patrols and generally keep
the heck away.

Again. The UFO's in question are the full count originally from an old
copy of the NUFORC database that was augmented with exact lat/lon of
each sighting by Sigmond Axel and put on GITHUB some time back.  I
thank the people involved for their work. I've tried to contact them
all via email some time back to say so. But you know how squirrelly
everyone is about answering emails these days.

The various plots and some explanatory text will eventually be
available at <kym.massbus.org/UFO/CAN-NUKE>.


In other news I'm about to finish off a long study of UFO navigation
models that maybe are consistent with what seems to be observed in
various satellite telescope data. Viz lots of stuff moving around all
the time.  The TESS data, in particular, is awash with dark objects
moving slowly across the frames hr by hr in front of background
stars. Not only do these objects seem to be in all directions the
telescope has ever looked, the density seems to be around 1000 objects
moving around in some direction all the time. Not only can we spot
these patterns of correlated darkening of stars (i.e. NOT related to
planets around said stars which is what TESS is actually looking for)
but the patterns of the darkenings correlate very strongly with UFO
sightings reported within 1-2 days of the patterns being observed. It
seems you see them coming and later also going.

The latest models extend prev work on trying to find what subset of
objects -- planets, comets, asteroids -- NASA et al keep track of
might explain UFO sightings and these "movement" patterns.  It seems
the best models the AI programs can come up with so far involve almost
any random selection of objects. It seems like the TESS images
suggest, things are moving around everywhere and Earth bound observers
just get to see the small sample that end up on their doorstep.

The models allow a rough estimate of the departure and residence time
of UFO's being calculated. I'm still waiting on a couple runs before I
can select a "best explanation". But preliminary numbers suggest UFO's
just wander from asteroid to asteroid, sometimes ending up on Earth
for no particular reason, and staying around 2 days then leaving again.

The best models are so far explaining around 1/3 of all UFO sightings.

--
World Oil Statistics
The world consumes 35,442,913,090 barrels of oil as of the year 2016,
equivalent to 97,103,871 barrels per day. · Global oil consumption per
capita is 5 barrels ...
Oil Reserves: 1,650,585,140,000
Oil Consumption: 35,442,913,090
Reserves/Consumption: 47	<== years left i.e. 2016+47 == 2063
-- Worldometer

"Nothing in life is to be feared, it is only to be understood.
Now is the time to understand more, so that we may fear less."
- Marie Curie

But what is true and I'm actually being serious here, is there are, there's
footage and records of objects in the skies that we don't know exactly what
they are, We can't explain how they moved, their trajectory. They did not
have an easily explainable pattern.
-- Pres Barack Obama, "The Late Show", 2021

"I think some of the phenomena we're going to be seeing continues to be
unexplained and might, in fact, be some type of phenomenon that is the
result of something that we don't yet understand."
--Ex-CIA Director John Brennan

"[F]or the few cases in all domains--space, air, and sea--that do
demonstrate potentially anomalous characteristics, AARO exists to help the
DOD, IC, and interagency resolve those anomalous cases. In doing so, AARO is
approaching these cases with the highest level of objectivity and analytic
rigor. This includes physically testing and employing modeling and
simulation to validate our analyses and underlying theories, and
peer-reviewing those results within the U.S. government, industry partners,
and appropriately cleared academic institutions before reaching any
conclusions."
-- Dr Sean Kirkpatrick, Senate Hearings on UFOs, 19 Apr 2023.

Unidentified aerial phenomena I. Observations of events
B.E. Zhilyaev, V. N. Petukhov, V. M. Reshetnyk
Main Astronomical Observatory, NAS of Ukraine,
Zabalotnoho 27, 03680, Kyiv, Ukraine
[...] We present a broad range of UAPs. We see them everywhere. We observe a
significant number of objects whose nature is not clear. Flights of single,
group and squadrons of the ships were detected, moving at speeds from 3 to
15 degrees per second. Some bright objects exhibit regular brightness
variability in the range of 10 - 20 Hz.  Two-site observations of UAPs at a
base of 120 km with two synchronised cameras allowed the detection of
a variable object, at an altitude of 1170 km. It flashes for one hundredth
of a second at an average of 20 Hz. [...]
An object contrast makes it possible to estimate the distance using
colourimetric methods.  [Objects with 0 albedo] are observed in the
troposphere at distances up to 10-12 km. We estimate their size from 3 to 12
meters and speeds up to 15 km/s. [...]
[Astronomers in Ukraine have undertaken their own independent survey
of objects they see flying over the Kyiv region at speeds around 15
km/sec.  They are watching the daytime sky at the zenith and in front
of the moon.  They see many objects -- some bright and some dark,
different sizes.  They travel often singly but sometimes in large
groups.  They report brightness is linked with speed. The spectrum
of bright objects is reportedly not reflected sunlight.  Objects
have been spotted inside the atm upto ~10 km but also out to ~1000 km
above the earth, travelling up to ~1000 km/sec.  They are not likely
anything sent by Russia or any other country].